Catalina, Part 2: Tracks & Splits

Catalina, Part 2: Tracks & Splits


When I boarded the Bottom Scratcher the night of August 24, the first thing I did was plug in my phone and activate the Instamapper GPS tracking app.

Why was this the first thing I did? As most of my readers must know by now, I have as much fun (probably more fun, actually) analyzing marathon swims as actually doing marathon swims. Hence my six-part MIMS report.

As usual, the data tell an interesting story. The yellow path shows the GPS tracks of the boat which, except at the start and finish, was between 5-25 meters off my left side. The red line shows the straight-line “ideal” path between the start and finish. The white placemarks are self-explanatory.

I covered the first 5 miles in 2:06:50 (25:22 per mile), my fastest pace of the swim despite big swells and chop throughout the night. I was 12 minutes slower for the second 5-mile chunk (27:44 per mile), probably because I was plowing through the same waves and chop, but with substantially less fresh shoulders.

I hit the halfway mark (10 miles) at 4 hours, 25 minutes. So, contrary to our calculations at the time, I actually wasn’t on pace for a low-8 hour swim. In fact, I was on pace for pretty much what I ended up with – just under 9 hours.

In the second half of the swim I ran into the strong NW-to-SE cross current that had bedeviled many recent Catalina swims. Notice how my tracks “bow out” to the right of the “ideal” path, especially around 15-16 miles. The current is pushing me away from the finish (toward Long Beach), and the boat is forced to turn almost due north (against the current) to hit Point Vicente.

Despite the adverse current I held my pace steady – 2:13 (26:42 pace) for miles 11-15 and just under 2:17 (27:22 pace) for miles 16-20 — including some slow kelp crawling at the end. Indeed, my two 10-mile splits were within 5 minutes of each other: 4:30:28 vs. 4:25:31.

The difference between my slowest pace and fastest pace – about 2 minutes per mile – corresponds well to my subjective experience. Though, the pace itself (25-27 minutes per mile) is much slower than my typical pace in a pool (or neutral open-water conditions). For the first half of the swim it was the chop. For the second half it was the currents. In both cases I was slowed by, I’d estimate, 2-3 minutes per mile.

To be continued…

12 Responses to “Catalina, Part 2: Tracks & Splits”

  1. d barra

    2011-09-03T16:56:22+00:00

    if i detect any whining, i’ll be forced to show you a chart from 7/20/10 that shows the sorry-assed swimmer had a few hours of .5/mph (yeah… .5) due to the “current event” du jour.

    Reply
    • Evan

      2011-09-03T17:19:58+00:00

      no whining, i swear it! i consider myself lucky… so many things that could have gone wrong, that didn’t.

      I thought about your swim a lot, actually… it was, after all, the inspiration for the magic words!

      Reply
      • d barra

        2011-09-03T17:34:54+00:00

        who will be the first to have the “magic words” tattoo? (i bet we could convince some random english person to do it after a few pints)

        Reply
        • Evan

          2011-09-03T18:13:45+00:00

          John may need to file a trademark before this gets out of hand…

          Reply
  2. Chicken O'C

    2011-09-03T17:30:57+00:00

    This is terrifying

    Reply
  3. Chicken O'C

    2011-09-03T17:42:51+00:00

    I’m half inclined to commission a swimsuit with the magic words written across the backside

    Reply
  4. IronMike

    2011-09-06T10:40:05+00:00

    Magic words?

    Reply
  5. Donal

    2011-09-19T08:59:38+00:00

    That’s very … straight. Evan, is Catalina generally that direct? I find the idea of going straight on a channel swim quite intriguing.

    Reply
    • Evan

      2011-09-19T11:34:21+00:00

      Catalina swims are typically pretty straight. The tidal flows are not nearly what they are in the E.C., and if anything they’re parallel to the swim direction. There can often be a minor cross-current (as you can see in my GPS tracks), but it’s not predictable vis-a-vis the tides.

      Reply

Leave a Reply