Letters from Connie: There Is No Perfect Stroke

Letters from Connie: There Is No Perfect Stroke


Conrad Wennerberg is Chairman Emeritus of the International Marathon Swimming Hall of Fame and author of the authoritative history of marathon swimming: Wind, Waves, and Sunburn. Originally published in 1974, the book was re-printed in 1999, and is now out of print once again. (Used copies are available through Amazon.)

Wind, Waves, and Sunburn

Conrad (or “Connie,” as he’s known to friends) is a familiar face at Promontory Point in Chicago, my preferred training location in 2010-11. Now in his 80s, Connie still takes his noontime dip in Lake Michigan, May through October. Connie is also responsible for rescuing a treasured thermos of mine, which his friend Frank the Klepto had stolen during a late-season training swim. True story.

I’m just now getting around to reading Wind, Waves, and Sunburn, and it’s delightful. More than anything else I’ve read, it captures the spirit of marathon swimming – and this power is undimmed by the passing of 37 years. For some perspective: in 1974, the records for the fastest crossings of the English and Catalina Channels were both held by Lynne Cox.

1962 Lake Michigan marathon swimIn an early chapter, Connie recounts the classic “36 3/4 to 50 mile” Lake Michigan race in 1962. This race was actually two races in one. First, a 36 3/4-mile swim from Chicago to Waukegan, Illinois – an attempt to break Ted Erikson’s record of 35 hours for the same distance the previous year (Chicago to Michigan City, Indiana). The first swimmer to reach Waukegan could choose to exit the water and collect $4,000. Or, swimmers could choose to keep going past Waukegan, all the way to Kenosha, Wisconsin – a distance of 50 miles and a new world record for distance. The first swimmer to reach Kenosha would win $10,000.

Of the 20 or so swimmers who dove into Lake Michigan that day, only three would finish: Ted Erikson, Greta Andersen, and Dennis Matuch. All three would subsequently be enshrined in the marathon swimming hall of fame. In Connie’s eyes, the story of their epic race is more than a story: It’s an allegory. He describes their respective stroke techniques:

Ted Erikson was “poetry in motion”–the classic stroke with hardly a millimeter variation between either arm as it entered the water. His legs beat in a steady, even throb that impressed the observer. His powerful arms carried him through the water at a speed of close to two miles per hour. Here was the man to watch. His forty-eight strokes per minute would prevent his burning out.

Moving on to Dennis Matuch, a local lifeguard with a decidedly different approach to swimming:

His arms worked in what seemed like frenzied action. Eighty-five strokes per minute…. Extremely short, his high stroke rate prevented any smooth entry of his hands and arms into the water. Consequently there was a splash upon entry into the water and corresponding flurry of water upon recovery. The average spectator would also have been amazed at the total non-use of his legs. They simply dragged along behind him…. Spectators scratched their heads and said, “This man will drown shortly.”

And finally, Greta Andersen, the greatest female marathon swimmer of her era:

What one would have observed would have been an extremely uneven stroke. As Greta turned her head to the right to breathe, her left arm reached only a little more than half the distance ahead as the right arm. One would have been tempted to say, “What a cock-eyed stroke.” It was very uneven and looked quite uncomfortable to the swimmer.

Based on these observations, Connie concludes:

Ted Erikson would win this race. Greta Andersen, if she were lucky, would go half way. Dennis Matuch would drown in about another ten minutes. Self-satisfied, the general observer would sit back and await the “sure” and inevitable outcome.

Conrad Wennerberg
Conrad Wennerberg at Promontory Point

So, what actually happened?

  • Dennis Matuch swam 36 3/4 miles to Waukegan in 21 hours, earning a new world record and $4,000.
  • Greta Andersen, five minutes behind Matuch, continued on to Kenosha, finishing in 31 hours — a new world record for distance, earning the top prize of $10,000.
  • Ted Erikson, three hours behind Andersen at Waukegan, also kept going. By the time he reached Kenosha he was five hours behind. In reward for 36 hours of swimming, he received nothing but a metaphorical pat on the back.

The chapter concludes with a statement as true today as it was in 1974:

The moral to be learned from the above is that one should never stress the importance of “evenness” and proportion that characterizes the classic swimming stroke. The individual variations in human anatomy and physiology preclude warping an individual’s personal adaptation to the water into the closed channel of “water ballet” perfectionism.

Hear, hear!

And Connie, if you read this, please give my regards to Frank the Klepto.

15 Responses to “Letters from Connie: There Is No Perfect Stroke”

  1. d barra

    2012-02-07T17:40:20+00:00

    symmetry is its own reward

    Reply
  2. Chicken O'Sea

    2012-02-07T18:50:22+00:00

    Friendly Frank gave me a brownie last time I was at The Point.

    Reply
  3. Chicken O'Sea

    2012-02-08T14:39:30+00:00

    I don’t know, but the Tupperware it was in had “Morrison” written on it.

    Reply
    • Evan

      2012-02-08T15:11:09+00:00

      FrrrrrraaaaAAAANNNNK!

      Reply
    • ViveBene

      2012-02-09T10:03:36+00:00

      No! Yes! OK, I’ll believe it.
      On strokes: I got tired of non-coach coaches pointing out a 37-y-o former ballerina and telling me, 60+ y.o. nonathlete, “Swim like her!”

      Conrad Wennerberg’s Wind, Waves and Sunburn is awesome, and I am really glad you got your Thermos back.

      Reply
      • Evan

        2012-02-09T10:32:38+00:00

        If only it were that simple!

        I’m glad to have the thermos back, too. I even have two now, having ordered a replacement after thinking the first one lost for good.

        Reply
  4. ViveBene

    2012-02-09T15:30:44+00:00

    Ted does have a beautiful stroke. It look effortless, but he eats up distance.

    Reply
  5. Review: A book about swimming that is not about swimming | LoneSwimmer

    2012-02-17T00:42:01+00:00

    […] I’ve covered a few of swimming books a long time ago, two of the big books of our sport Kathy Watson’s The Crossing and Peggy Lee Dean’s Open Water Swimming and Bill Sweetenham’s Championship Swim Training. A few of the guys are excellent at covering open water swimming books, particularly Mark Robson‘s links of the classics of our sport and Evan recently had a great review of Wind, Waves and Sunburn. […]

    Reply
  6. Mallory

    2012-02-27T13:41:15+00:00

    I have such strong feelings on this subject I can’t finish a thought without getting irritated.

    Reply
    • Mallory

      2012-02-27T13:43:34+00:00

      I guess what I meant to say was “I concur.”

      Reply
      • Evan

        2012-02-27T14:19:13+00:00

        Haha… I got you – and I am the same way. And this perspective needs to be heard! As we all know, those who argue the other side are never reluctant to voice theirs.

        Reply
        • Mallory

          2012-03-03T18:09:39+00:00

          Even though I have personal experience with those types of people that’s not even the real reason I take such issue with it.

          My final fury on the subject was formed when I listened to a certain coach on a certain Master’s Team stand on deck and talk smack about a certain highly decorated female distance swimmer, proclaiming that “Thats not how you swim.” Then, at the end of the swimmers workout, another swimmer introduced the coach to said highly decorated female distance star because, of course, this swimmer had never heard of this coach, even if the coach had heard of the swimmer.

          Decode that!

          Reply
          • Evan

            2012-03-04T20:14:18+00:00

            I think I know the swimmer you mean! Yes, it’s interesting to hear people explain swimmers who succeed with non-classical stroke technique. Usually it goes something like, “Well, so-and-so has off-the-charts V02 max so (s)he succeeds in spite of his/her technique. (S)he would go faster if (s)he swam more like [other swimmer, usually Sun Yang].”

            Which raises the question, Just how fast do you have to be for your success to explained because of technique rather than in spite of it?

Leave a Reply